![]() If you're NOT going to ever shoot at 'night' like we do (live on a chicken and goat farm and get coyotes and egg-eating raccoons, etc.), you might prefer more 'ordinary' sights. Then, if the gun shows promise, I may put a more expensive sight (whether 'optic' or 'peep' or whatever) than I would have otherwise. One thing I sometimes do when I first get a new gun is mount an old 32x BSA scope I have on it, regardless of the type of gun, just to shoot it off a bench and see what maximum accuracy it is capable of without assuming the sights are a factor. ![]() However, as to your question, the inherent accuracy of the gun will not be affected by the sights at all. I can get 50-yard groups like this at midnight, so how could I not like the gun.? I'm not familiar with the red-dot you mention, but an easy 'fix' might just be to get a smaller one like the Burris Fastfire-II, and keep using the same mount, if it's not too bulky. It shoots easy, and it is capable of doing well in good light, poor light, or total darkness. One of my favorite leverguns and my current 'go-to' gun is a 92 clone with a Bushnell Fastfire-II (and a LaserMax pistol sight and a flashlight-mount. ![]() I'd suggest firing the gun as-is for awhile to get a feel for it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |